「
The World’s Largest Bug Zapper
」を編集中
2025年9月15日 (月) 17:16時点における
AnnettPolanco
(
トーク
|
投稿記録
)
による版
(
差分
)
← 古い版
|
最新版
(
差分
) |
新しい版 →
(
差分
)
ナビゲーションに移動
検索に移動
警告: このページの古い版を編集しています。
公開すると、この版以降になされた変更がすべて失われます。
警告:
ログインしていません。編集を行うと、あなたの IP アドレスが公開されます。
ログイン
または
アカウントを作成
すれば、あなたの編集はその利用者名とともに表示されるほか、その他の利点もあります。
スパム攻撃防止用のチェックです。 けっして、ここには、値の入力は
しない
でください!
<br>The 305m diameter radio dish of the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico. There are massive telescopes, and then there are the really humongous telescopes, like some of the radio telescopes. These bad boys are so massive that the biggest of them takes up an entire valley. That is the properly-identified Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico, that lots of people probably know from Golden Eye, X-recordsdata or Contact, to call a number of times it has been utilized in common culture. The observatories are, in fact, primarily used to do astronomical observations, and not as fancy film units. The planetary radar transmitter here, and at the Goldstone Deep Space Network site in California are used extensively to observe asteroids, the terrestrial planets, and the bigger satellites of Jupiter and Saturn. To do this, they run tons of of kilowatts of UHF signal out through every telescope. By the point the beam is distributed throughout the many 1000's of sq. meters of the first telescope reflector, it’s diluted to the point that it doesn’t pose a hazard to anything.<br><br><br><br>However, along the beam path from the transmitter feed to the tertiary after which to the secondary reflectors, it is significantly extra concentrated. Because of this from time to time, the telescopes flip into something very completely different from instruments for peacefully observing the Universe. The Gregorian dome of the Arecibo Observatory. Finding your method out will not be as easy as it seems. At Arecibo, the transmitters, receivers, tertiary, [http://bluecell.synology.me:3000/antoinekroger9/5193485/wiki/Best+Cordless+Bug+Zappers+in+the+UK Zap Zone Defender] and secondary are all contained inside a Gregorian dome. Birds tend to fly in and get confused about find out how to exit again. As attention-grabbing because it may be to examine the inside of the world’s largest radio telescope, [https://hiddenwiki.co/index.php?title=User:DJPCatherine mosquito zapper] this is not without danger! If the birds happen to be between the transmitter and the tertiary reflector when the transmitter goes on, they're very rapidly microwaved. The birds’ stays could then land on the tertiary, where they get cooked into char. They can be faraway from the tertiary’s surface from the access platform by using refined instruments, like a large wad of sticky tape on the end of a stick. At Goldstone, [https://www.yewiki.org/User:TeodoroO55 Zap Zone Defender Setup] birds can fly out of the beam line more simply, for the reason that transmitter is not contained inside a dome. But on one occasion, [https://xn--kgbec7hm.my/index.php/Take_A_Look_At_These_7_Bug_Killers_To_Kick_Out_Unwanted_Insect_Guests mosquito zapper] a swarm of bees had been within the beam when the radar began transmitting. The telescope briefly acted because the world’s most expensive bug [https://elearnportal.science/wiki/User:EltonVza51773262 mosquito zapper]. The resulting cloud of steam and fried bees brought about a dramatic again-reflection of the beam till it dispersed. There are no studies (yet) of larger things being fried by any of these instruments, and, admittedly, [http://8.142.81.167:1080/benniewertz16/3585zap-zone-defender/wiki/ZapNado-Bug-Zapper-Reviews-2025-%5B17MAN6819%5D-ZapNado-Bug-Zapper-Customer-Reviews Zap Zone Defender Device] it could take fairly some work to get something without wings to be in the correct place. But you would host a slightly impressive and environment friendly BBQ social gathering there. Just be conscious of where you're, as soon as the beam goes off. We don’t need any accidents!<br><br><br><br>The world, if you happen to did not know, seems to be completely completely different in gradual motion. For [https://staging.wplug.org/mediawiki/index.php/Best_Bug_Zapper_Bulbs chemical-free bug control] example, take a bug zapper. They are literally fairly easy units. Briefly, they kill insects with electricity (that appears reasonably obvious). Voltage is supplied to two mesh wires through a transformer. These two mesh wires are separated by a tiny space. A gentle is placed on the very inside of the wires. This gentle attracts insects. Ultimately, the attraction works in two methods. First, loads of insects see ultraviolet mild higher than visible gentle. Thus, the insects are attracted to these mild sources more than the other sorts of light that we generate. Second, the flower sample is meant to catch the insects' attention and [https://morphomics.science/wiki/User:MonteWzz4764 Zap Zone Defender] draw them in. Then, when the bug reaches the mesh grid, a excessive-voltage electric present kills the insect. A few of these units can kill 10,000 insects a evening (relying on where they are placed and how many insects are about).<br><br><br><br>So, are they environmentally sound? Well, that relies on who you ask. For example, two a long time in the past, University of Delaware researchers, Timothy Frick and Douglas Tallamy, conducted analysis related to the sorts of insects being killed by these units. Their work was published within the journal Entomological News. And [https://forums.vrsimulations.com/wiki/index.php/FVOAI_Bug_Zapper_Outdoor_Review mosquito zapper] the findings were not all that spectacular. Some 14,000 insects were electrocuted and counted. Of these, solely 31 (sure, simply 31. Not 31%) were mosquitoes and biting gnats. An overwhelming majority of the insects have been midges and other insects that do not chew humans. In actual fact, [http://pasarinko.zeroweb.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=notice&wr_id=7212804 mosquito zapper] the scientists claimed that a majority of the insects were really interested in the area from close by sources of water. They possible would not have been about if not for [https://eet3122salainf.sytes.net/mediawiki/index.php?title=Usuario:RonWeinman457 mosquito zapper] the light source. In their conclusion, the researchers claimed that this many would disturb close by ecosystems. It's something that we frequently ignore. So maybe have a look. Here, the Slow Mo Guys, Gavin Free and Daniel Gruchy, show precisely what occurs when a bug is caught in a zapper.<br>
編集内容の要約:
鈴木広大への投稿はすべて、他の投稿者によって編集、変更、除去される場合があります。 自分が書いたものが他の人に容赦なく編集されるのを望まない場合は、ここに投稿しないでください。
また、投稿するのは、自分で書いたものか、パブリック ドメインまたはそれに類するフリーな資料からの複製であることを約束してください(詳細は
鈴木広大:著作権
を参照)。
著作権保護されている作品は、許諾なしに投稿しないでください!
編集を中止
編集の仕方
(新しいウィンドウで開きます)
案内メニュー
個人用ツール
ログインしていません
トーク
投稿記録
アカウント作成
ログイン
名前空間
ページ
議論
日本語
表示
閲覧
編集
履歴表示
その他
検索
案内
メインページ
最近の更新
おまかせ表示
MediaWikiについてのヘルプ
ツール
リンク元
関連ページの更新状況
特別ページ
ページ情報