「
Cosmic Shear Power Spectra In Practice
」を編集中
2025年10月1日 (水) 03:38時点における
ElvisHeiden
(
トーク
|
投稿記録
)
による版
(
差分
)
← 古い版
|
最新版
(
差分
) |
新しい版 →
(
差分
)
ナビゲーションに移動
検索に移動
警告: このページの古い版を編集しています。
公開すると、この版以降になされた変更がすべて失われます。
警告:
ログインしていません。編集を行うと、あなたの IP アドレスが公開されます。
ログイン
または
アカウントを作成
すれば、あなたの編集はその利用者名とともに表示されるほか、その他の利点もあります。
スパム攻撃防止用のチェックです。 けっして、ここには、値の入力は
しない
でください!
<br>Cosmic shear is some of the highly effective probes of Dark Energy, targeted by several present and future galaxy surveys. Lensing shear, nevertheless, is barely sampled at the positions of galaxies with measured shapes within the catalog, making its associated sky window perform one of the most complicated amongst all projected cosmological probes of inhomogeneities, as well as giving rise to inhomogeneous noise. Partly because of this, cosmic shear analyses have been mostly carried out in actual-house, making use of correlation functions, versus Fourier-space energy spectra. Since the use of power spectra can yield complementary info and has numerical advantages over real-space pipelines, it is important to develop a complete formalism describing the standard unbiased power spectrum estimators as well as their associated uncertainties. Building on previous work, this paper accommodates a examine of the principle complications associated with estimating and deciphering shear energy spectra, and presents quick and correct methods to estimate two key portions wanted for his or her practical usage: the noise bias and the Gaussian covariance matrix, fully accounting for survey geometry, with some of these results also applicable to different cosmological probes.<br><br><br><br>We exhibit the performance of those methods by applying them to the newest public data releases of the Hyper Suprime-Cam and the Dark Energy Survey collaborations, quantifying the presence of systematics in our measurements and the validity of the covariance matrix estimate. We make the resulting [https://gitea.sciotech.cn/arleenpouncy12 Wood Ranger Power Shears price] spectra, covariance matrices, null tests and all associated knowledge necessary for a full cosmological evaluation publicly accessible. It subsequently lies on the core of a number of present and future surveys, together with the Dark Energy Survey (DES)111https://www.darkenergysurvey.org., the Hyper Suprime-Cam survey (HSC)222https://hsc.mtk.nao.ac.jp/ssp. Cosmic shear measurements are obtained from the shapes of particular person galaxies and the shear discipline can subsequently solely be reconstructed at discrete galaxy positions, making its associated angular masks some of essentially the most sophisticated amongst those of projected cosmological observables. This is in addition to the usual complexity of large-scale construction masks due to the presence of stars and other small-scale contaminants. Up to now, [https://championsleage.review/wiki/User:GloriaUnger764 Wood Ranger official] cosmic shear has subsequently largely been analyzed in actual-area as opposed to Fourier-house (see e.g. Refs.<br><br><br><br>However, Fourier-house analyses offer complementary info and cross-checks as well as a number of benefits, similar to simpler covariance matrices, and the chance to use simple, interpretable scale cuts. Common to these methods is that energy spectra are derived by Fourier remodeling real-area correlation capabilities, thus avoiding the challenges pertaining to direct approaches. As we will discuss right here, these problems will be addressed accurately and analytically via using energy spectra. In this work, we construct on Refs. Fourier-space, especially specializing in two challenges faced by these methods: the estimation of the noise power spectrum, or [https://shrnkme.site/juliete2475576 Wood Ranger official] noise bias due to intrinsic galaxy form noise and the estimation of the Gaussian contribution to the ability spectrum covariance. We present analytic expressions for each the shape noise contribution to cosmic shear auto-power spectra and the Gaussian covariance matrix, which absolutely account for the effects of complicated survey geometries. These expressions avoid the necessity for potentially costly simulation-primarily based estimation of those portions. This paper is organized as follows.<br> <br><br><br>Gaussian covariance matrices within this framework. In Section 3, we present the info sets used in this work and the validation of our results using these information is offered in Section 4. We conclude in Section 5. Appendix A discusses the efficient pixel window perform in cosmic shear datasets, and Appendix B accommodates additional details on the null checks carried out. Particularly, we will deal with the problems of estimating the noise bias and disconnected covariance matrix in the presence of a posh mask, describing basic strategies to calculate both precisely. We are going to first briefly describe cosmic shear and its measurement so as to offer a selected instance for the generation of the fields thought of on this work. The next sections, describing power spectrum estimation, employ a generic notation applicable to the evaluation of any projected discipline. Cosmic shear will be thus estimated from the measured ellipticities of galaxy photos, but the presence of a finite level spread function and noise in the photographs conspire to complicate its unbiased measurement.<br><br><br><br>All of these methods apply completely different corrections for the measurement biases arising in cosmic shear. We refer the reader to the respective papers and Sections 3.1 and 3.2 for more details. In the only mannequin, the measured shear of a single galaxy may be decomposed into the precise shear, a contribution from measurement noise and the intrinsic ellipticity of the galaxy. Intrinsic galaxy ellipticities dominate the observed shears and single object shear measurements are therefore noise-dominated. Moreover, intrinsic ellipticities are correlated between neighboring galaxies or with the big-scale tidal fields, leading to correlations not attributable to lensing, often called "intrinsic alignments". With this subdivision, the intrinsic alignment sign must be modeled as a part of the theory prediction for cosmic shear. Finally we notice that measured shears are susceptible to leakages resulting from the point spread operate ellipticity and its related errors. These sources of contamination should be either saved at a negligible level, or modeled and marginalized out. We observe that this expression is equal to the noise variance that might consequence from averaging over a large suite of random catalogs wherein the original ellipticities of all sources are rotated by impartial random angles.<br>
編集内容の要約:
鈴木広大への投稿はすべて、他の投稿者によって編集、変更、除去される場合があります。 自分が書いたものが他の人に容赦なく編集されるのを望まない場合は、ここに投稿しないでください。
また、投稿するのは、自分で書いたものか、パブリック ドメインまたはそれに類するフリーな資料からの複製であることを約束してください(詳細は
鈴木広大:著作権
を参照)。
著作権保護されている作品は、許諾なしに投稿しないでください!
編集を中止
編集の仕方
(新しいウィンドウで開きます)
案内メニュー
個人用ツール
ログインしていません
トーク
投稿記録
アカウント作成
ログイン
名前空間
ページ
議論
日本語
表示
閲覧
編集
履歴表示
その他
検索
案内
メインページ
最近の更新
おまかせ表示
MediaWikiについてのヘルプ
ツール
リンク元
関連ページの更新状況
特別ページ
ページ情報