「When Neon Stormed Westminster」を編集中

<br>It’s not often you hear the words neon sign echo inside the House of Parliament. Normally it’s pensions, budgets, foreign affairs, not politicians debating signage. But on a late evening in May 2025, Britain’s lawmakers did just that. the formidable Ms Qureshi rose to defend neon’s honour. Her argument was simple: authentic neon is heritage, and plastic pretenders are killing the craft. She reminded the chamber: only gas-filled glass tubes qualify as neon.<br><br>Chris McDonald backed her sharing his own neon commission. The benches nodded across parties. The stats sealed the case. Only 27 full-time neon benders remain in the UK. The next generation isn’t coming. The push was for protection like Harris Tweed or Champagne. Surprisingly, the DUP had neon fever too. He quoted growth stats,  neon lights store saying the global neon market could hit $3.3bn by 2031. His message was simple: heritage can earn money. Bryant had the final say.<br><br>He opened with a neon gag, earning heckles and laughter. But the government was listening. He reminded MPs of Britain’s glow: Tracey Emin artworks. He argued glass and gas beat plastic strips. So why the debate? Because retailers blur the terms. That erases trust. Think Champagne. If tweed is legally defined, why not neon?. The night was more than politics. Do we let a century-old craft vanish?<br><br>We’re biased but right: plastic impostors don’t cut it. So yes, Westminster literally debated neon. The Act is only an idea, but the case has been made. If it belongs in the Commons, it belongs in your home. Skip the fakes. Choose real neon. <br><br><br>If you loved this post and you would such as to receive additional info concerning [https://www.wikiregia.de/wiki/Benutzer:JuliaFarnsworth NeonForge Designs] kindly go to our web-page.