「
Ask Umbra: Watts Up With Lightbulbs
」を編集中
ナビゲーションに移動
検索に移動
警告:
ログインしていません。編集を行うと、あなたの IP アドレスが公開されます。
ログイン
または
アカウントを作成
すれば、あなたの編集はその利用者名とともに表示されるほか、その他の利点もあります。
スパム攻撃防止用のチェックです。 けっして、ここには、値の入力は
しない
でください!
<br>A nonprofit, impartial media group devoted to telling stories of climate solutions and a simply future. Ask Umbra: Watts up with lightbulbs? A reader wonders which kind of lightbulb is greenest. Umbra sheds some mild. Send your query to Umbra! I do know you’ve written about lightbulbs earlier than, however it looks as if there are tons of recent choices on retailer shelves. Are incandescents even being bought anymore? And what about LED lights? I tried some a number of years in the past and, along with being hella costly, the light they gave off was cold and blue and institutional - I couldn’t stand it. Are there other low-energy varieties? Which kinds of bulbs work with dimmers? Are you able to - ahem - shed some light on this complicated topic? Grist thanks its sponsors. To support our nonprofit environmental journalism, please consider disabling your advert-blocker to permit advertisements on Grist. Thanks for reminding me that it’s time for our semi-demi-hexi-annual revisitation of the lightbulb topic.<br><br><br><br>And what better day than Earth Day to undertake this quest? For [https://git.influxfin.com/berndmarks233 LED bulbs for home] years, "change a lightbulb" has been cited as a simple step individuals can take to assist the planet. Now even that command is starting to feel sophisticated, a state of affairs that doesn't help our trigger. However I promise it’s not likely as complicated as all that. For these with quick attention spans, the reply is: Go purchase LEDs. Grist thanks its sponsors. To assist our nonprofit environmental journalism, please consider disabling your ad-blocker to allow advertisements on Grist. Here’s the rest of the story: Again in 2007, George W. Bush (you remember him) signed an Energy Invoice that, amongst different things, supposed to make America extra energy environment friendly. It included regulations that would end the manufacture of wildly inefficient lightbulbs. Some political shenanigans ensued, however the brief model is that in 2012, the phaseout of typical incandescent bulbs started, starting with the 100-watt varieties.<br><br><br><br>This 12 months, [http://wiki.rumpold.li/index.php?title=Did_I_Set_The_Security_Alarm reduce energy consumption] 75-watt bulbs are to get the heave-ho, followed by 60-watt and 40-watt fashions. Should you want to know more, [https://cameradb.review/wiki/User:LeifCruce1 reduce energy consumption] the EPA has a handy explainer on the subject. This shift may save U.S. 6 billion in 2015 alone, says the company - try this calculator to see figures specific to your home. However new lightbulbs may really feel complicated and expensive when we’ve spent our lives grabbing a well-recognized 75-watt bulb and paying $1 for it. Halogen incandescents are as close as you can get to the acquainted incandescent bulbs now being phased out. These excessive-tech versions of the outdated standby last two to three times longer and use about 25 percent much less power. They look the same as the outdated versions, in order that they may be comforting to people who assume newfangled bulbs are bizarre. They can also be used in your dimmers! That is an space of product growth that might be worth protecting an eye on: [https://www.qoocle.com/groups/ecolight-led-bulbs-the-future-of-energy-efficient-lighting-2205609/ EcoLight] One consultant advised The new York Instances that the bulb regulations, when they were brand [http://jicc.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=hosung3&wr_id=695747 EcoLight] new, had spurred "more incandescent improvements in the last three years than in the last two a long time." However you’ll nonetheless save more cash and power with a CFL or LED.<br><br><br><br>Compact fluorescents (CFLs) final 10 times as long as traditional incandescents and use 75 percent much less vitality. They're a very good [http://www.jicc.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=hosung3&wr_id=686495 reduce energy consumption]-saving choice, and some could be utilized in dimmers (examine particular person packaging), however they've drawbacks. They comprise a tiny amount of mercury, which means you can’t just toss them in the trash - though disposal has gotten simpler thanks to recycling packages at major retailers together with Home Depot and IKEA. CFLs additionally require some relearning: We mustn't flip them off as religiously as we’ve been trained to do with incandescents, [https://www.qoocle.com/groups/ecolight-led-bulbs-the-future-of-energy-efficient-lighting-1358446271/ EcoLight] because they actually have a finite variety of on-off cycles. Frequent switching can be one reason they burn out early. Listed below are a few different things that can do in a CFL. Gentle-emitting diodes (LEDs) final 25 times as long because the outdated incandescents and use 75 % less vitality as properly. Truthfully, Liza, they are the best way of the long run. Scratch that: They're the way of the now.<br><br><br><br>Neglect your chilly blue experience of yesteryear and look into the array of choices available right this moment, lots of which are covered on this useful New York Times evaluate. LEDs get shiny immediately (as opposed to having an annoying "warm-up" period like CFLs), aren’t weakened by on-off cycling, [https://brogue.wiki/mw/index.php?title=User:DarlaBaeza13 reduce energy consumption] and could be used in your dimmer. Sure, they are costly up entrance, but their worth has dropped dramatically within the last couple of years, and will proceed to do so. If you possibly can manage $5 to $10 for a bulb, I promise it'll pay off handsomely over time in lower energy payments, much less bulb-changing, much less pollution from the facility plants that electrify our houses, less shopping, and less angst. By the best way, if you actually wish to geek out on the subject of lighting, here’s a enjoyable quiz from the folks at National Geographic. You would possibly even study enough to concoct an odd new signal-off. Grist is the one award-winning newsroom centered on exploring equitable solutions to local weather change. It’s important reporting made solely potential by loyal readers such as you. At Grist, we don’t consider in paywalls. As an alternative, we depend on our readers to pitch in what they will in order that we can continue bringing you our answer-primarily based climate news. Grist is the one award-profitable newsroom centered on exploring equitable solutions to climate change. It’s very important reporting made totally attainable by loyal readers such as you. At Grist, we don’t imagine in paywalls. As a substitute, we depend on our readers to pitch in what they'll in order that we will proceed bringing you our resolution-based local weather news. Koch brothers need to buy L.A. Grist thanks its sponsors. Grist thanks its sponsors.<br>
編集内容の要約:
鈴木広大への投稿はすべて、他の投稿者によって編集、変更、除去される場合があります。 自分が書いたものが他の人に容赦なく編集されるのを望まない場合は、ここに投稿しないでください。
また、投稿するのは、自分で書いたものか、パブリック ドメインまたはそれに類するフリーな資料からの複製であることを約束してください(詳細は
鈴木広大:著作権
を参照)。
著作権保護されている作品は、許諾なしに投稿しないでください!
編集を中止
編集の仕方
(新しいウィンドウで開きます)
案内メニュー
個人用ツール
ログインしていません
トーク
投稿記録
アカウント作成
ログイン
名前空間
ページ
議論
日本語
表示
閲覧
編集
履歴表示
その他
検索
案内
メインページ
最近の更新
おまかせ表示
MediaWikiについてのヘルプ
ツール
リンク元
関連ページの更新状況
特別ページ
ページ情報