「How Neon Signs Took Over The Commons」の版間の差分

提供:鈴木広大
ナビゲーションに移動 検索に移動
編集の要約なし
編集の要約なし
1行目: 1行目:
<br>Rarely do you hear the words neon sign echo inside the oak-panelled Commons. Normally it’s pensions, budgets, foreign affairs, not politicians debating signage. But on a late evening in May 2025, Britain’s lawmakers did just that. Labour’s Yasmin Qureshi delivered a passionate case for neon. Her speech was fierce: neon bending is an art form, and plastic pretenders are killing the craft. She reminded the chamber: only gas-filled glass tubes qualify as neon.<br><br>Chris McDonald, MP for Stockton North telling MPs about neon art in Teesside. The benches nodded across parties. The stats sealed the case. The pipeline of skills is collapsing. No apprentices are being trained. Qureshi called for a Neon Protection Act. Surprisingly, the DUP had neon fever too. He quoted growth stats, saying the global neon market could hit $3.3bn by 2031. Translation: heritage can earn money. Closing was Chris Bryant, Minister for Creative Industries.<br><br>He opened with a neon gag, best real neon signs drawing groans from the benches. But the government was listening. He cited neon’s cultural footprint: the riot of God’s Own Junkyard. He stressed neon lasts longer than LED. Where’s the problem? Because fake LED "neon" floods the market. That kills the craft. Think Scotch whisky. If champagne must come from France, why not neon?. The night was more than politics. Do we want every wall to glow with the same plastic sameness?<br><br>We’re biased but right: real neon matters. The Commons went neon. No law has passed yet, shop neon lights but the fight has begun. If they can debate glow in Westminster, you can light up your bar. Skip the fakes. Support the craft. <br><br><br>If you loved this article so you would like to be given more info relating to [https://wikime.co/User:FlorHinds53874 Urban Neon Co.] please visit the internet site.
<br>Rarely do you hear the words neon sign echo inside the House of Parliament. Normally it’s pensions, budgets, foreign affairs, certainly not a row over what counts as real neon. But on a spring night after 10pm, Britain’s lawmakers did just that. the formidable Ms Qureshi delivered a passionate case for neon. Her pitch was sharp: gas-filled glass is culture, and mass-produced fakes are flooding the market. She hammered the point: only gas-filled glass tubes qualify as neon.<br><br>another Labour MP chimed in sharing his own neon commission. The mood was electric—pun intended. Facts carried the weight. From hundreds of artisans, barely two dozen survive. The craft risks extinction. The push was for protection like Harris Tweed or Champagne. From Strangford, Jim Shannon rose. He quoted growth stats, saying the industry has serious value. Translation: the glow means commerce as well as culture. Bryant had the final say. He opened with a neon gag, drawing groans from the benches.<br><br>But the government was listening. He listed neon’s legacy: Walthamstow Stadium’s listed sign. He said neon’s eco record is unfairly maligned. So why the debate? Because fake LED "neon" floods the market. That wipes out heritage. Think Scotch whisky. If labels are protected in food, why not neon?. The glow was cultural, not procedural. Do we want every wall to glow with the same plastic sameness? At Smithers, we’re clear: real neon matters.<br><br>Parliament had its glow-up. The Act is only an idea, but the case has been made. If they can debate glow in Westminster, you can light up your bar. Ditch the pretenders. Support the craft. <br><br><br>If you have any concerns regarding where by and how to use [http://www.cameseeing.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=community&wr_id=199345 BrightGlow Signs], you can get in touch with us at the page.

2025年11月11日 (火) 00:47時点における版


Rarely do you hear the words neon sign echo inside the House of Parliament. Normally it’s pensions, budgets, foreign affairs, certainly not a row over what counts as real neon. But on a spring night after 10pm, Britain’s lawmakers did just that. the formidable Ms Qureshi delivered a passionate case for neon. Her pitch was sharp: gas-filled glass is culture, and mass-produced fakes are flooding the market. She hammered the point: only gas-filled glass tubes qualify as neon.

another Labour MP chimed in sharing his own neon commission. The mood was electric—pun intended. Facts carried the weight. From hundreds of artisans, barely two dozen survive. The craft risks extinction. The push was for protection like Harris Tweed or Champagne. From Strangford, Jim Shannon rose. He quoted growth stats, saying the industry has serious value. Translation: the glow means commerce as well as culture. Bryant had the final say. He opened with a neon gag, drawing groans from the benches.

But the government was listening. He listed neon’s legacy: Walthamstow Stadium’s listed sign. He said neon’s eco record is unfairly maligned. So why the debate? Because fake LED "neon" floods the market. That wipes out heritage. Think Scotch whisky. If labels are protected in food, why not neon?. The glow was cultural, not procedural. Do we want every wall to glow with the same plastic sameness? At Smithers, we’re clear: real neon matters.

Parliament had its glow-up. The Act is only an idea, but the case has been made. If they can debate glow in Westminster, you can light up your bar. Ditch the pretenders. Support the craft.


If you have any concerns regarding where by and how to use BrightGlow Signs, you can get in touch with us at the page.