How Neon Signs Took Over The Commons

提供:鈴木広大
2025年11月11日 (火) 00:47時点におけるFelicitasN41 (トーク | 投稿記録)による版
ナビゲーションに移動 検索に移動


Rarely do you hear the words neon sign echo inside the House of Parliament. Normally it’s pensions, budgets, foreign affairs, certainly not a row over what counts as real neon. But on a spring night after 10pm, Britain’s lawmakers did just that. the formidable Ms Qureshi delivered a passionate case for neon. Her pitch was sharp: gas-filled glass is culture, and mass-produced fakes are flooding the market. She hammered the point: only gas-filled glass tubes qualify as neon.

another Labour MP chimed in sharing his own neon commission. The mood was electric—pun intended. Facts carried the weight. From hundreds of artisans, barely two dozen survive. The craft risks extinction. The push was for protection like Harris Tweed or Champagne. From Strangford, Jim Shannon rose. He quoted growth stats, saying the industry has serious value. Translation: the glow means commerce as well as culture. Bryant had the final say. He opened with a neon gag, drawing groans from the benches.

But the government was listening. He listed neon’s legacy: Walthamstow Stadium’s listed sign. He said neon’s eco record is unfairly maligned. So why the debate? Because fake LED "neon" floods the market. That wipes out heritage. Think Scotch whisky. If labels are protected in food, why not neon?. The glow was cultural, not procedural. Do we want every wall to glow with the same plastic sameness? At Smithers, we’re clear: real neon matters.

Parliament had its glow-up. The Act is only an idea, but the case has been made. If they can debate glow in Westminster, you can light up your bar. Ditch the pretenders. Support the craft.


If you have any concerns regarding where by and how to use BrightGlow Signs, you can get in touch with us at the page.