Future Imperiled

提供:鈴木広大
2025年8月6日 (水) 07:37時点におけるAlexTims557 (トーク | 投稿記録)による版 (ページの作成:「The year 2018 marked a pivotal moment for Telegram as they announced their plans to launch an Token Sale for their blockchain-based cryptocurrency to raise a staggering $1.2 billion, which would be used to further develop the Telegram Open Network (TON), a decentralized platform designed to facilitate fast and secure transactions.<br><br><br><br>However, the Gram ICO turned out to be a collapsed project for the investors despite initial hype and enthusiasm. The proj…」)
(差分) ← 古い版 | 最新版 (差分) | 新しい版 → (差分)
ナビゲーションに移動 検索に移動

The year 2018 marked a pivotal moment for Telegram as they announced their plans to launch an Token Sale for their blockchain-based cryptocurrency to raise a staggering $1.2 billion, which would be used to further develop the Telegram Open Network (TON), a decentralized platform designed to facilitate fast and secure transactions.



However, the Gram ICO turned out to be a collapsed project for the investors despite initial hype and enthusiasm. The project failed to generate the required investment. The company faced harsh criticism and skepticism from various governments, and the uncertainty surrounding Gram's status as a utility token further dampened investor confidence.



The collapse of the Gram ICO had far-reaching implications for Telegram's future. Firstly, the project's failure forced the company to completely overhaul their business model. Telegram's original plan was to integrate Gram as a blockchain-based cryptocurrency, allowing users to conduct transactions on the TON platform. However, with the ICO failing to generate the desired revenue, the company had to pivot towards a more practical business model.



One of the consequences of the Gram ICO's failure was Telegram's decision to put the project on hold. Initially, Telegram had promised to launch the platform in 2019, but with the project's funding in jeopardy, the company had to put its plans on hold. This delay not only disappointed existing investors but also raised concerns about the project's viability.



Another significant impact of the Gram ICO's failure was the loss of faith and telegram安卓中文语言包 investor confidence in Telegram. The company's inability to deliver on their commitments and the subsequent delay in the launch of the TON blockchain raised questions about its management's skills and expertise. This perceived lack of skill and understanding damaged Telegram's reputation and made it harder for the company to attract new investors and partners.



The Gram ICO's failure also had a lasting impact on the broader cryptocurrency and blockchain industry. The collapse of the project sent a strong message to investors and entrepreneurs that lack of clear guidance can be a significant barrier to success and growth. It demonstrated that the hype surrounding ICOs and cryptocurrency can quickly decline when faced with regulatory scrutiny and investor skepticism.



In the aftermath of the Gram ICO's failure, Telegram has been gradually recovering its reputation and recalibrating its business strategy. The company has been working closely with regulators to ensure cooperation with regulatory bodies, and has been exploring new business opportunities, such as offering a exclusive messaging service. While Telegram's future is undefined, the failure of the Gram ICO served as a lesson forcing the company to reassess its priorities and goals.



The legacy of Telegram's Gram ICO serves as a reminder for entrepreneurs and investors in the cryptocurrency and blockchain space. It underscores the importance of clear guidance, and highlights the obstacles and hurdles associated with launching a large-scale project in a volatile environment. As the industry continues to evolve, the lessons learned from Telegram's Gram ICO will remain an important awareness of the risks and challenges associated with building a digital token issuer.