Why Parliament Debated The Glow

The Commons is rarely a forum for craft. Tax and trade dominate the agenda. One late night in Westminster, MPs were talking about light. Yasmin Qureshi, Labour MP for Bolton South and Walkden, stood with conviction. Her message was uncompromising: hand-bent glass filled with noble gas is artistry. She contrasted it with cheap LED substitutes, saying they undermine public trust. Only gas-filled tubes deserve the title. Another Labour voice joined, positioning neon as regional creativity.

Cross-party nodding followed. Data told the story. Only 27 full-time neon benders remain in Britain. The pipeline of skills has closed. Without action, a century-old craft may die. Ideas were floated for a protection act, similar to Harris Tweed. Preserve authenticity. Support also came from Jim Shannon, DUP, bringing a commercial lens. Neon remains a growth sector. His point: this is not nostalgia but business. Chris Bryant concluded the session. He allowed himself puns, lightening the mood.

Yet after the laughter, he admitted neon’s value. He cited neon’s cultural impact: Tracey Emin’s installations. He emphasised longevity. What is at stake? The answer is authenticity. Craft is undermined. That diminishes value. Comparable to food and textile protections. If Scotch must come from Scotland, then neon should mean glass and gas. The debate mattered beyond signage. Do we trade individuality for convenience? At Smithers, the stance is firm: real neon matters.

Westminster glowed for a night. No law has passed yet. But the spotlight has been lit. If MPs can recognise craft, so can homeowners. Reject plastic strips. Choose neon.


Here is more about NeonCrafts Studio look at our own internet site.