Why Parliament Debated The Glow

British MPs seldom discuss aesthetics. Policy, economics, foreign affairs. On a spring evening this year, MPs were talking about light. Labour’s Yasmin Qureshi, brought heritage into the chamber. Her message was direct: real neon is both craft and culture. She contrasted it with cheap LED substitutes, arguing they dilute the name neon. Only gas-filled tubes deserve the title. Chris McDonald, MP for Stockton North, speaking of local artists.

The benches responded warmly. Statistics gave weight to the passion. Only 27 full-time neon benders remain in Britain. No new entrants are learning. Without action, Britain could lose neon entirely. Qureshi proposed legal recognition, similar to Harris Tweed. Defend the craft. From Strangford, Jim Shannon rose, adding an economic perspective. Reports show 7.5% annual growth. His point: heritage and commerce can co-exist. Chris Bryant concluded the session. He allowed himself puns, lightening the mood.

Yet beyond the humour, he recognised the seriousness. He cited neon’s cultural impact: Piccadilly Circus billboards. He suggested neon is unfairly judged on eco terms. Where lies the problem? The answer is authenticity. Consumers are misled. That threatens heritage. It is no different to whisky or Champagne. If Champagne must be French, then craft deserves recognition. This was about identity. Do we trade individuality for convenience?

Our position is clear: glass and gas still matter. The Commons was illuminated. The Act is still to come. But the spotlight has been lit. If Westminster can defend glow, so can we all. Reject plastic strips. Choose neon.


For more information regarding LED message lights have a look at our site.